Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, employment HOST: Federal staff members have until February 6 to decide whether to voluntarily leave their tasks. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, informed employees on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be allowed to depart and be paid until the end of September. Michelle Bercovici is an employment attorney who represents as a big part of her practice, so I asked her for her interpretation about what OPM’s postponed resignation program would really mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I in fact do not consider it a lot a deal. I believe it’s a demand to resign with a vague guarantee that, possibly, you could be kept in administrative leave status for as much as 8 months – however no guarantees.MARTIN: Some individuals have actually been using the term buyout to describe what this is due to the fact that there appears to be the offer of administrative leave for approximately 8 months if you take this offer. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would never explain it as a buyout. I believe that’s a very misleading term to utilize in this circumstance. When you believe of a buyout, there’s usually some sort of written agreement or a concrete deal to offer an advantage in exchange for waiving particular rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If customers ask you for your guidance, what are you telling them?BERCOVICI: First thing we inform them is exercise severe care. There are no guarantees consisted of in this email. The only thing I can inform you for certain is that if you change your mind, the company’s most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are essentially quiting control over a lot.MARTIN: Is there some classification of employee who you believe this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is somebody like that might this be an attractive offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement require to be the most cautious due to the fact that leaving earlier than intended can have serious consequences, possibly, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She told press reporters that this is an excellent offer for people who don’t want to return to the workplace. Let me just play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a tip to federal employees that they need to return in – to work. And if they do not, then they have the option to resign, and this administration is really kindly using to pay them for eight months.MARTIN: employment You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It simply – in a manner, employment it breaks my heart that federal workers are being jerked around like this. It sends a signal to me that this return-to-office order is in bad faith, that it’s developed to get folks who work actually hard to resign. I believe it’s attempting to pull the wool over a great deal of people’s eyes since there are no guarantees. And these are people who like their job. They love the objective of the company. They strive. And right now, they’re dealing with very tough choices, particularly if they’re remote. I indicate, it’s extremely coercive.MARTIN: You state it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re somebody who lives in Oregon and has been informed to report to D.C. or else we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you anticipate legal challenges just to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This deal, to be sincere, is so unmatched that I think a lot of us are still attempting to determine what to do with it. I’m not sure if the deal itself may be challengeable. I think the bigger concern is the execution of these terms. I’m not knowledgeable about any authority that exists right now for OPM to buy firms to provide this variety of people administrative leave. So I think it is quite possibly setting the stage for difficulties due to the fact that I feel OPM has vastly surpassed their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is an employment legal representative with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you a lot for joining us.BERCOVICI: Thank you so much for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of usage and authorizations pages at www.npr.org for additional info.

NPR records are developed on a rush due date by an NPR professional. This text might not remain in its last form and might be upgraded or modified in the future. Accuracy and schedule might differ. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.