Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal employees have until February 6 to choose whether to voluntarily leave their tasks. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, notified employees on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be enabled to depart and be paid up until the end of September. Michelle Bercovici is an employment legal representative who represents federal employees as a big part of her practice, so I asked her for her analysis about what OPM’s postponed resignation program would actually mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I in fact don’t consider it a lot a deal. I believe it’s a demand to resign with an unclear promise that, potentially, you might be kept in administrative leave status for up to eight months – however no guarantees.MARTIN: Some people have been using the term buyout to describe what this is since there appears to be the deal of administrative leave for as much as 8 months if you take this offer. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would never describe it as a buyout. I think that’s a very misleading term to utilize in this situation. When you believe of a buyout, there’s typically some sort of written agreement or a concrete offer to supply an advantage in exchange for waiving specific rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If customers ask you for your guidance, employment what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: First thing we inform them is exercise severe caution. There are no guarantees consisted of in this email. The only thing I can tell you for certain is that if you change your mind, the agency’s probably not going to let you that resignation, employment and you are basically quiting control over a lot.MARTIN: Is there some classification of staff member who you believe this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is someone like that may this be an attractive offer?BERCOVICI: employment Folks near retirement require to be the most careful due to the fact that leaving earlier than meant can have severe repercussions, potentially, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She informed reporters that this is an excellent offer for employment individuals who do not wish to return to the workplace. Let me simply play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a tip to federal employees that they have to return in – to work. And if they don’t, then they have the choice to resign, and this administration is extremely kindly providing to pay them for 8 months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It simply – in a way, it breaks my heart that federal workers are being jerked around like this. It sends out a signal to me that this return-to-office order is in bad faith, that it’s developed to get folks who work truly difficult to resign. I think it’s attempting to pull the wool over a lot of people’s eyes since there are no guarantees. And these are people who enjoy their task. They like the mission of the firm. They strive. And right now, they’re facing really hard choices, specifically if they’re remote. I imply, it’s very coercive.MARTIN: employment You state it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re someone who lives in Oregon and has been informed to report to D.C. or else we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no choice than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you anticipate legal difficulties just to the offer itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This offer, to be truthful, is so unprecedented that I think a great deal of us are still trying to figure out what to do with it. I’m not exactly sure if the deal itself may be challengeable. I think the bigger question is the execution of these terms. I’m not familiar with any authority that exists today for OPM to order companies to offer this number of people administrative leave. So I think it is quite potentially setting the stage for challenges since I feel OPM has greatly exceeded their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is an employment lawyer with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you a lot for signing up with us.BERCOVICI: Thank you a lot for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights booked. Visit our website regards to use and authorizations pages at www.npr.org for more information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush due date by an NPR professional. This text may not remain in its last kind and might be updated or modified in the future. Accuracy and schedule may differ. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.